Legal Opinion

Metz v. County of Suffolk

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ralph F. Costello, J.

*915Petitioner’s application for an order declaring that there was probable cause as to the petitioner’s complaint in the instant matter, and that the New York State Division of Human Rights (NYSDHR) enter such a finding; or, alternatively, that the NYS-DHR demand of respondent that the respondents provide to the NYSDHR a list of all available clerk/typist positions, locations and dates they were filled as they relate to the dates of discrimination alleged by the petitioner and that said respondents provide to NYSDHR said information and that NYSDHR…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McFarland v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Giles v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Bal v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Moorehead v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Sidoti v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DiNatale v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API