Legal Opinion

Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

96 N.J. 336 (1984)

476 A.2d 250

JOHN C. CRISPIN AND MICHELLE CRISPIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

VOLKSWAGENWERK, A.G., A WEST GERMAN CORPORATION AND VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 12, 1983.

Decided June 13, 1984.

David J. Sheehan argued the cause for appellants (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan & Purcell, attorneys).

Stephen S. Weinstein argued the cause for respondents (Stephen S. Weinstein, attorney; Martin Liberman, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J.

Shorn of its procedural…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Handler; Dissent; Concurrence · Handler.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Andersen v. Exxon Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API