Legal Opinion

Giannini v. South Carolina Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 2008No. 26508PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

These consolidated appeals arise out of tort claims actions filed by the plaintiffs against the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT). The jury returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs; the trial court reduced the verdicts pursuant to the S.C. Tort Claims Act, S.C.Code Ann. § 15-78-10 et seq. The plaintiffs and SCDOT appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

These cases arise out of an automobile accident which occurred on January 4, 2000, on Interstate 77 (1-77) in Columbia, between the Boyden Arbor overpass and Percival Road. At 8:10 p.m., a Ford Expedition driven by Barry…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Dempsey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boiter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Sea Cove Development, LLC v. Harbourside Community BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Chastain v. ANMED HEALTH FOUNDATIONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. LucasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API