Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Nozick
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 26, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00240Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION LARRY COCHRAN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 2:20CV240-PPS/JEM DAVID J. NOZICK, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Larry Cochran, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers . . .” Erickson v. Pardus,
551 U.S. 89, 94
(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Trina L. Carpenter v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016