Legal Opinion
Hiller v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided September 25, 2007No. 02681Published
1Opinion of the Court
Henry, Bruce R., J.
This matter came on to be heard on the motion of the plaintiff seeking certification of this matter as a class action pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 23. The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of all Massachusetts residents who are owners of Daimler-Chrysler vehicles equipped with the Gen-III seat belt buckle. This Court (Quinlan, J.) previously granted summary judgment in favor of DaimlerChrysler on the plaintiffs claims of negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and c.93A violations, leaving extant only the plaintiffs claims of breaches of express and implied warranties. For…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.