Legal Opinion

Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Gerlach

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 7, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action Tby the Ansonia Brass & Copper Company against Charles A. Gerlach and James Curran to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. There was a judgment in favor of defendant Curran, and defendant Gerlach appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The action was originally brought by the Ansonia Brass & Copper Company to foreclose a lien claimed by it pursuant to the provisions of the mechanic’s lien law (chapter 342, Laws 1885), and against the defendants Charles A. Gerlach, as owner and contractor, and James Curran, as lienor. Subsequent to the commencement of the action it was discontinued so far as the plaintiff was thereby affected, and directed to proceed upon the issues tendered by the answers of the defendants, Curran and Gerlach, respectively. Curran claimed to be entitled to a lien for work, labor, and services rendered and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Woodward v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Phillip v. . GallantNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Crane v. . BaudouineNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mikolajewski v. PugellNew York Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API