Legal Opinion
Mikolajewski v. Pugell
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Buffalo.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages against the contractor in a building contract for a failure to complete the building to be erected for the plaintiffs within the stipulated time.
The defendant agreed in his contract with the plaintiffs to complete the building in question on or before the 30th of October, 1906. As a matter of fact, the building was not *450completed until March, 1907. The contract price was $3,250. Payments had been made from time to time, but a balance on the contract price remained unpaid. The defendant demanded the balance and threatened to file a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pryor v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hexter v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Sinclair v. TallmadgeNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Dunn v. . SteubingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Allamon v. Mayor of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1864
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kleinfelter v. GrangerNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- National Pencil Co. v. Pinkerton's National Detective AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Empire Heating Corp. v. James Stewart & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
- Rice, Barton & Fales Machine & Iron Co. v. Hoffman-Youmans Paper MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913