Legal Opinion
Brown v. Beard
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 27, 2007No. Civil Action No 06-5405PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to vacate the Court’s order granting Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 24). A decision on this motion requires the Court to determine what allegations a prisoner must make, in the denial of medical care context, to sufficiently allege that he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury,” thereby allowing him to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), notwithstanding the fact that he already has had three prior actions dismissed as frivolous. Because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Brown v. BlaineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Brown v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Brown v. JamesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Brown v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Brown v. LyonsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Brown v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Brown v. LevyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.