Legal Opinion

In re Bloomingdale

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided July 1, 1895Published

Certiorari, in re Bloomingdale and others, to compel the granting of á liquor license by the board of excise.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

The relators, on the 8th. of August, 1894, made an application for a storekeeper’s license for the premises 990-1008 Third avenue. The application was referred to one of the inspectors of the board of excise, who reported favorably thereon. On the 7th of September, 1894, the bond which was attached to said application was approved by the board of excise, and notice given to the relatera that, upon complying with the rule established by the respondents, the license applied for by them would be issued ; such rule being, in brief, that the board of excise required that, before the issuance of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. People ex rel. Decker v. WatersNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. NortonNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  4. People ex rel. Jones v. PennettNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API