Legal Opinion

Williams v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 9, 1997No. 5:97 CV 0594PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DOWD, Senior District Judge.

Defendant, The Tobacco Institute, Inc. (“TI”), has filed, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), a motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff has opposed the motion and, in the alternative, has requested that resolution of the motion be delayed until after Plaintiff has the opportunity to conduct limited discovery on the question of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed below, the Court shall defer ruling on Defendant TI’s motion.

DISCUSSION

TI raises two arguments in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollar v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  2. Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API