Williams v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DOWD, Senior District Judge.
Defendant, The Tobacco Institute, Inc. (“TI”), has filed, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), a motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff has opposed the motion and, in the alternative, has requested that resolution of the motion be delayed until after Plaintiff has the opportunity to conduct limited discovery on the question of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed below, the Court shall defer ruling on Defendant TI’s motion.
DISCUSSION
TI raises two arguments in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hollar v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998