Legal Opinion

Stark v. Meriwether

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1917No. 19,888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; Hugh J. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

A rehearing was granted upon the complaint of counsel for Meriwether that the former opinion (Stark v. Meriwether, 98 Kan. 10, 157 Pac. 438) overlooked his main contention. Counsel insists that he “relied chiefly, aggressively, and most confidently throughout the entire litigation upon one specific and most prominent fact which appeared in the findings of the trial court.” The complaint then proceeds:

“And this was the omission. The findings refer to the Coulter map thereto attached. The fifth finding refers to island ‘B’ as shown on *651said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Powers v. ScharlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Kansas v. MeriwetherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  4. Stark v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kininmonth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Lillard v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. De Boe v. Prentice Packing Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Schiffelbein v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Swisher v. McMainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API