Legal Opinion

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Furlong Oil & Minerals Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1983No. Civ. 10430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Amerada Hess Corporation appeals from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order. We reverse and remand.

The K-119 Well, which is the subject of this controversy, was drilled in 1956 by Am-erada Petroleum Corporation, predecessor *131to Amerada Hess Corporation, pursuant to an oil and gas lease from Clifford and Alice Syverson. The well was completed in the Rival Zone of the Madison Pool and produced oil and gas until September 1969 when it was shut-in.1 Amerada released the oil and gas lease as to the Syversons’ interest in November 1974.

In November 1982, the Syversons…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edgeley Education Ass'n v. Edgeley Public School District 3North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wahpeton Public School District No. 37 v. North Dakota Education Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Brace v. Steele CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Allen v. Minot Amusement Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Amerada Hess Corp. v. Furlong Oil & Minerals Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HolecekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. Stremick Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Advanced Business Telephones, Inc. v. Professional Data Processing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API