Amerada Hess Corp. v. Furlong Oil & Minerals Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
Amerada Hess Corporation appealed from a judgment denying its requested injunction prohibiting Furlong Oil and Minerals Company from using the K-119 well bore and awarding Furlong damages for work stoppages caused by the issuance of a temporary restraining order sought and received by Amerada. Furlong cross-appealed from that portion of the judgment determining that Furlong was not entitled to punitive damages. We affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.
On 26 October 1949, Clifford A. Syverson and Alice 0. Syverson leased their oil and gas interest in a parcel of land…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Corwin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Shark Bros., Inc. v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Chester v. EinarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Olson v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Minot v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Osland v. OslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Berdahl v. North Dakota State Personnel BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Vanover v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HuweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Hector v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.