Legal Opinion

United States v. Carbo

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 16, 1993No. ACMR 9100941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

GRAVELLE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of four specifications of false swearing, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], His sentence to a dishonorable discharge was approved by the convening authority.

On 23 September 1992, this court found that it was unable to determine from the record whether the appellant was a commissioned or noncommissioned warrant officer at the time of trial, such status being crucial in determining if a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. BriscoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. AlleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. CarboU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. StockmanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. WalkerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API