Legal Opinion

Haro v. Sebelius

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 9, 2011No. CV 09-134 TUC DCBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.

Putative class Plaintiffs, Medicare beneficiaries and an attorney representing beneficiaries, challenge the collection practices and procedures employed by Defendant’s Center for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) program for reimbursement under Medicare as Secondary Payer (MSP) provisions. 1 The questions before the Court are purely legal: 1) whether Defendant can require prepayment of a MSP reimbursement claim before the correct amount is administratively determined where the beneficiary either appeals or seeks a waiver of the MSP reimbursement claim, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sherr v. Healtheast Care SystemDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API