Legal Opinion

Mitcherling v. Rosselli

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1985No. 36, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

We are here concerned with the procedure to be followed in filing a notice of rejection of an award entered by a Health Claims Arbitration panel. The precise question involved is whether a timely filing of the notice with the Director of the Health Claims Arbitration Office will suffice, or whether the notice must also be filed with the individual members of the arbitration panel.

The facts are not in dispute. Appellees’ dental malpractice claim against Appellant was heard by an arbitration panel pursuant to Maryland Code (1974, 1984 Repl.Vol., *3651985 Cum.Supp.) §§ 3-2A-01…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Mitcherling v. RosselliCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Karl v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Wyndham v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Wimmer v. RichardsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Mitcherling v. RosselliCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API