Legal Opinion
Gastelum v. Nordstrom Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 19, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01377Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Fernando Gastelum, No. CV-24-01377-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Nordstrom Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pro se Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) has filed a Motion for Summary 16 Judgement as to “Liability Only.” (Doc. 28). This Motion is fully briefed.1 (Docs. 30– 17 31). The Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion for the following reasons. 18 I. Background2 19 Plaintiff is a self-described “ADA tester.” (Doc. 1 at ¶ 2). Plaintiff is indeed a 20 frequent flyer of the district court. See Gastelum…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.