Legal Opinion · Dissent

Edward S. Burton v. Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc., a Corporation in the Territory of Alaska

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1957No. 15030_1Published

1DissentLemmon, Circuit Judge

We have frequently adverted to the weight that courts should accord to findings and decisions made by administrative boards in the exercise of what Mr. Justice Frankfurter is fond of calling “expertise.”1

Once again we are faced with an attempt by a trial court to interfere, this time by injunction, with the activities of a public utility operating under a certificate lawfully granted to it by a regulatory commission.

®In its brief, the appellee ascribes to the appellants a “monstrous contention that an existing public transportation system, franchised and licensed in accordance with law and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. HemenwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. In re O'Harra Bus Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API