Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. C & C Helicopter Sales, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Tom Cannon & Associates LTD.’s (“Cannon”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of In Personam Jurisdiction and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Due to Forum Non Conveniens (D.I.32). For the reasons discussed, the motion will be granted.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (“Bell”) filed this action for trademark infringement and related causes of action in the United States arising from the sale of a helicopter created from the wreckage of a Bell Model 206B helicopter that was destroyed in a crash in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Parker v. Learn the Skills Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. NVDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Freres v. SPI Pharma, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- ESTATE OF CARVEL EX REL. CARVEL v. RossDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Ali v. Beechcraft Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.