Legal Opinion

Freres v. SPI Pharma, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 25, 2009No. C.A. 06-540-GMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge:

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Roquette Freres (“Roquette”), a French company, filed this patent infringement action against SPI Pharma, Inc. “(SPI”), a Delaware corporation, on August 31, 2006, alleging that SPI’s MANNOGEM ” EZ 1 spray dried mannitol product infringes United States Patent No. 5,573,777 (the “'777 patent”). On October 20, 2006, Roquette filed its first amended complaint adding Drytec Ltd., a British corporation, as an infringing defendant. 2 On December 6, 2006, Drytec Ltd. moved to dismiss for lack of personal…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nespresso USA, Inc. v. Ethical Coffee Co. SADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  2. Astrazeneca AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  3. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
  4. Round Rock Research LLC v. Asustek Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
  5. Richard Hessee v. Simoff Horse Transport, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API