Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Norton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1934No. 29,694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DEVANEY, Chief Justice.

Action to have certain mortgage foreclosure proceedings declared null and void and to have the documents and instruments now on file evidencing the same expunged from the records. Plaintiffs are the mortgagors. Fannie W. Norton is the mortgagee named in the mortgage. June 6, 1931, the mortgage was in default. Under a proper power of attorney Henry W. Norton commenced foreclosure by advertisement under a notice of foreclosure sale executed by the mortgagee. June 20, 1931, the mortgagee died. At that time three notices of foreclosure had been published, and due notice had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Noon v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Betcher v. BetcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Gua.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Duffy v. StrattonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Estate of TorresSuperior Court of Guam · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API