Legal Opinion

CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES, MONT. v. Moe

District Court, D. Montana

Decided February 4, 1975No. Civ. 2145PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

Before BROWNING, Circuit Judge, and SMITH and JAMESON, District Judges. PER CURIAM:

This is an action by the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation and three enrolled members of the Tribes, suing on behalf of themselves and all other members of the Tribes, “seeking to declare unconstitutional the enforcement against plaintiffs of Title 84, Rev.Mont.Code §§ 5606 et seq., the Montana cigarette sales tax and dealer licensing statutes” and for an injunction restraining the enforcement of the statutes and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.1 A…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Matthew B. Connolly, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Oneida Nation of New York v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Dewitt Dillon, Cross-Appellants v. The State of Montana, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API