Legal Opinion

People v. Sweeney

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 2016No. E064273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

Petitioner Leo Sweeney (defendant) was convicted of 10 felonies, all arising out of a take-over bank robbery, and sentenced to a total of 82 years to life in prison. He filed a petition to redesignate two of those felonies as misdemeanors pursuant to Proposition 47. (This would not change the total term.) The trial court denied the petition; it ruled that defendant was not eligible for relief under Proposition 47, because the two felonies at issue were accompanied by gang enhancements.

Defendant appeals. We will hold that the gang enhancements did not disqualify defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. Sherow CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. Dinh Van Nguyen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API