Legal Opinion
Sonfield v. Burleson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1989No. 88-CA-1182Published
1Opinion
ON REHEARING
On the application of plaintiff we granted a rehearing in order to reconsider her claims for the cost of replacing the engine, rental car charges, finance charges, and costs for tax, title, and license.
C.C. art. 2531 provides as follows:
“The seller who knew not the vices of the thing is only bound to repair, remedy or correct the vices as provided in Article 2521, or if he be unable or fails to repair, remedy or correct the vice, then he must restore the purchase price, and reimburse the reasonable expenses occasioned by the sale, as well as those incurred for the preservation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Davidson v. New Roads Motor Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Williams v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1987
- Wheeler v. Clearview Dodge SalesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Slay v. AterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.