Legal Opinion
C.B. v. Marysville Joint Unified School District, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 3, 2026No. 2:25-cv-03509Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 C.B., Case No. 2:25-cv-03509-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MARYSVILLE JOINT UNIFIED (ECF No. 11) SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff C.B. is proceeding in this action with counsel and has filed a First 19 Amended Complaint.1 (ECF No. 11) (“FAC”). The Court granted Plaintiff’s request to 20 proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the original Complaint with leave to amend 21 within 30 days. 3/30/2026 Order (ECF No. 9). 22 I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.