Legal Opinion

Horton v. Wilkerson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1941No. 13770PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beix, Justice.

1. In an action for land, wliere both parties claim under a common grantor, it is not necessary to show title in such common grantor. Code, § 33-101; Corker v. Stafford, 125 Ga. 428 (2) (54 S. E. 92); Walker v. Steffes, 139 Ga. 520 (77 S. E. 580); Moore v. Daugherty, 146 Ga. 176 (91 S. E. 14).

2. Where the petition alleged that the plaintiff and the defendant claimed the land in suit under a named common grantor, and the defendant answered that for want of sufficient information she could neither admit nor deny this averment, the answer was evasive, and the averment was to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Snipes v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Moore & Co. v. Daugherty, Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Walker v. SteffesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Swanson v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Wheelwright & Co. v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Gordon v. Commercial Auto Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. McEntyre v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Story v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Calhoun v. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API