Legal Opinion
McEntyre v. Burns
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 14, 1950No. 32713PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first contention is that the defendant was an innocent purchaser for value, not being charged with any notice of the title-retention contract between Mr. and Mrs. Brownagle and C. V. Nalley & Company, transferred to the plaintiffs, in that the motor number of the Chevrolet sedan was shown on the record at DAA-Y)9521 whereas the motor number of the Chevrolet car referred to in the title-retention contract was DAA-409521. The registration of the title-retention contract was governed by the laws relating to the registration of mortgages on personal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- First National Bank v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Merchants & Mechanics Bank v. BeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Moore & Co. v. Daugherty, Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harvey v. DeWeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Pease & Elliman Realty Trust v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Evans v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Carrollton Production Credit Ass'n v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955