Legal Opinion · Dissent

Honulik v. Town of Greenwich

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 13, 2009No. SC 18046Published

1DissentZarella, J.

I agree with much of Justice Katz’ thorough dissenting opinion. I write separately, however, to highlight those portions of that opinion with which I am in agreement and to add certain key points that ultimately lead me to conclude that General Statutes § 51-198 (c)1 is unconstitutional. In my view, *692§ 51-198 (c), although well intentioned, fails constitutional scrutiny because it purports to grant judicial powers2 to persons who are explicitly prohibited by our constitution from exercising them.

Article fifth, § 6, of the Connecticut constitution, as amended by article eight, § 2, of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norwalk Street Railway Company's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. Brown v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  3. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Bridgeport Public Library & Reading Room v. Burroughs HomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  5. Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API