Legal Opinion

Weston/Bean Joint Venture v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 16, 2014No. 11-31 C, No. 11-360 CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*3ORDER

ELAINE D. KAPLAN, Judge, U.S. Court of Federal Claims

Pending before the Court are two motions in limine: one filed by the government objecting on the basis of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine to plaintiffs use of various exhibits and the other filed by plaintiff, (“WB”), requesting in camera review of the exhibits at issue in the government’s motion.

For the reasons set forth below, each party’s motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

A. BACKGROUND

Weston/Bean Joint Venture (“WB”) entered into a contract with the US Army Corps of Engineers (“the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API