Legal Opinion

Grantham v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 1964No. 18286PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

This is an action to recover medical and funeral expenses allegedly due under the provisions of an automobile insurance policy, and this appeal involves the interpretation and application of a clause which excluded coverage for bodily injuries sustained by the insured while occupying an automobile “furnished for the regular use” of the insured or any relative.

The defendant issued to Mrs. Charlotte C. Grantham an automobile insurance policy covering a 1955 Poptiac automobile. The policy provided payments for medical and funeral expenses, up to $500.00, resulting from bodily…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  2. Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Leteff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Travelers Indemnity Company v. HydeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. DiOrio v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Bringle v. Economy Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Glisson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Heaton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API