Legal Opinion

Colban v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum. Regardless of whether State law or maritime law applies, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. If New York law applies, the question of proximate cause was for the court since the plaintiff’s narrative of the accident was uncontradicted (Rivera v. City of New York, 11 N Y 2d 856). We agree with the Appellate Division that the cause of the plaintiff’s fall was not the captain’s failure to provide a ladder.

If Federal maritime law applies, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed on the basis that no duty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vanderlinden v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Jackson v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Lauricella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Ira Haupt & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Scott v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Acosta v. FuentesNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dowling v. Consolidated Carriers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API