State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Thompson's School of Beauty Culture
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The appellants are the proprietors of various schools of cosmetology. While other issues are presented by the pleadings, at the trial, the issues were narrowed by stipulation to the question whether or not a school of cosmetology, that holds itself out as charging for students’ work, is engaged in the practice of cosmetology contrary to law.
The record shows that appellants, in the operation of their schools of cosmetology, do hold out to the public that work is done by students and that certain charges are made therefor. The evidence shows that it is not possible to furnish an adequate course…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- State Ex Rel. Fulton v. IvesSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Duncan v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Moler v. WhismanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Baker v. DalyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1926
3Cited by13 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Green v. ShamaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Mansfield Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Board of Registration of HairdressersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Schwarze v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.