Legal Opinion
LaRose v. Sponco Mfg. Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 3, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-4122PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
Presently before us, in this products liability action, is a motion to dismiss for lack of in 'personam jurisdiction, filed by defendant, Reece Supply Co. of Dallas, Inc. (“Reece”). Reece claims that it lacks the minimum contacts necessary to be haled into New Jersey as it has never transacted business in this State; in short Reece claims to have never purposefully availed itself of the benefits of this jurisdiction, and therefore should not be subject to the concomitant burden of being subjected to suit here. Plaintiff, Francis J. LaRose (“LaRose”) argues…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carteret Savings Bank, Fa v. ShushanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Carteret Savings Bank, FA v. ShushanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- One World Botanicals Ltd. v. Gulf Coast Nutritionals, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Derensis v. Coopers & Lybrand Chartered AccountantsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Calkins v. Dollarland, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.