Legal Opinion

Puntel v. Kirtides

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1961No. 6619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANCIS J. DONOFRIO, Superior Court Judge.

This is an action by Eugene Puntel, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Stephen Kirtides and Olympia Kirtides, his wife, hereinafter called defendants. The case was tried to the court sitting with a jury, and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendants moved for an instructed verdict on each count of the complaint. The court below granted the motion and plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff has several assignments of error which may be summarized into three categories:

1. That the court erred in directing a verdict for the reason that a prima…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Waddell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bowman v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Golfinos v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. NavratilCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Lieberman v. Brittain Hendrickson Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API