Lanahan v. Clark
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
One opinion suffices for the decision of these two appeals, each of which is from an order of the court below discharging a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in separate suits, one against the maker, and the other against the accommodation endorser, of certain promissory notes, which were discounted for full value before maturity, were duly protested for nonpayment, proper notice thereof having been given to the endorser; and, at the request of the maker, were subsequently purchased by plaintiff.
To meet this prima facie case,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Harper v. LukensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Musgrave v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- North Penn Bank v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Transbel Investment Co., Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Union Trust Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Gordon v. Mohawk Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- New York Hotel Statler Co. v. Girard National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GizynskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.