Legal Opinion
Maizel v. Epstein
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 10, 1952No. 11053_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
Molly Epstein sued Jack Plotkin, Samuel Maizel and Mary M. Maizel in the United States District Court for the District o'f Columbia for $15,400, the alleged unpaid balance of a promissory note. Plotkin and Maizel, in separate but identical answers, alleged they had been adjudicated bankrupts in the Eastern District of Virginia, and stated the erroneous conclusion that the mere adjudication had discharged the plaintiff’s claim against them. Mrs. Maizel’s answer, which is not in the record before us, apparently presented some other defense. All three defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vale v. BonnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- David v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Roberts v. American Newspaper Guild Roberts v. Evening Star Newspaper CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Felder v. D. Loughran Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Burkhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Viola Chvala v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., Ann Baker v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Miguel Pons v. Republic of CubaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.