St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. McFall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, G-arfield Countty; James »B. Cullison, Judge. Suit toy A. H. McFal'l against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On July 28, 1913, A. H. Mc-Fall, defendant in error, in the district court of Garfield county, sued St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, in damages for personal injuries, growing out of alleged negligence ■of the defendant. After answer filed, in effect, a general denial and a plea of contributory negligence and assumption of risk, in that as a car driver of the Enid City Railway Company he assumed the risk of crossing the tracks of defendant, there was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here.
The evidence shows that on February…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Chickasha St. Ry. Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eagle-Picher Lead Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- De Camp v. ComerfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hutchison v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ft. Smith & W. Ry. Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kraettli v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.