Legal Opinion

Villegas v. Weinstein & Riley, P.S.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 2010No. 3:10-cv-00304PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RICHARD P. CONABOY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the “Motion of Defendant Weinstein & Riley, P.S. to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief Can be Granted” (Doc. 17). Plaintiff initiated this action on February 9, 2 010, by filing her Complaint (Doc. 1) alleging that Defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Specifically, Plaintiff claims Defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when it falsely threatened to sue Plaintiff. According to Plaintiff, Defendant communicated the threat indirectly through…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API