Legal Opinion
United States v. David Frank Duncan, A/K/A Harold Celline
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 22, 1990No. 89-1087PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
David Frank Duncan, also known as Harold Celline, appeals from a conviction for knowingly receiving visual depictions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct, transported and shipped in interstate and foreign commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). We affirm.
I
In 1986 the United States Customs Service established a national undercover operation code named “Operation Borderline” to target people involved in the importation of child pornography into the United States. 1 As part of Operation Borderline, the Customs Service, in cooperation with the Canadian…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. James GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard L. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.