Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Gorenflo

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1935No. 31638Published

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

Appellant, plaintiff in the court below, filed suit against appellees, Irma Du Kate Gorenflo, and Mrs. Linda B. Du Kate, on a promissory note for fourteen thousand five hundred dollars secured by certain corporate stock pledged as collateral; the stock being in the Dunbar Du Kate Company. It was alleged in the declaration that the original note was for fifteen thousand dollars and was payable in ninety days after date, and had been renewed by the payment of five hundred dollars. There were three classes of shares involved in the pledge, being six hundred seven shares of class B common stock,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Missouri Real Estate Syndicate v. SimsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Burnett v. Dunn Commission & Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hesdorffer v. WelshMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Myers v. EstellMississippi Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API