Legal Opinion
Maitland v. Fishbein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 26, 2018No. 17-1142-cvUnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellants Edson and Yvonne Maitland, proceeding pro se, appeal from a judgment in favor of Lisa and Robert Fishbein and’ JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase). The Maitlands asserted federal claims, including a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, as well as state law claims sounding in fraud. Following a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district court dismissed the federal claims for failure to state a claim, concluded that the Maitlands failed to allege diversity jurisdiction, and declined to exercise…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Orville Cephas v. John Nash, Warden, Ray Brook Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Buskirk v. The United Group of CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Wright v. MusantiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Johnson v. FischerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Michael Friedman Group Inc. v. Digital Media Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Navigator Business Services LLC v. ChenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.