Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sussman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1941No. 8566PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on motions by defendants, Howard J. Levitt, individually and trading as Howard J. Levitt and Company, and Samuel Sussman, individually and as president of Pennsylvania Finance Company, Inc., for a new trial.

The instant defendants were indicted on charges of violations of the Criminal Code of the United States and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77a et seq. More particularly, the defendants were charged with: (1) devising a scheme and artifice to defraud and with employing such scheme to defraud in the sale of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Kopald-Quinn & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  4. Livezey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  5. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. D. H. Roe and Stratoray Oil, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corporation and Willard R. CusterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Hentzner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert SCHWARTZ, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,530 Lee E. Tarvestad v. United States of America, George A. Wyum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API