Legal Opinion
Stanley v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 2, 1974No. 58, September Term, 1973PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410, 89 S. Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), purported “to explicate” Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U. S. 108, 84 S. Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964). Spinelli is not itself without some need of explication. The precise influence of Spinelli upon Aguilar and the murky relationship to both of Draper v. United States, 358 U. S. 307, 79 S. Ct. 329, 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959), govern our review of the conviction by a Baltimore County jury, Judge H. Kemp MacDaniel presiding, of the appellant, David Richard Stanley, for the possession of heroin.
The sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- People v. DiFalcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.