Legal Opinion

United States v. Perlman

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 13, 1996No. NMCM 95 00710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, Judge:

In his single assigned error1, the appellant alleges that the convening authority improperly required him to serve adjudged confinement that was to be suspended pursuant to a pretrial agreement. We agree with the appellant and hold that there was neither proper vacation of a suspension of execution of confinement nor permissible repudiation by the convening authority of his pretrial agreement obligation to suspend the confinement in question.

The appellant’s adjudged sentence was reduction to pay grade E-l, forfeitures, a bad-conduct discharge, and confinement for 14 weeks. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. EnglertNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. KendraU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. SaylorU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API