Hastings v. Dollarhide
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Solano Comity. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
This is an action on a non-negotiable promissory note, executed by the defendants to Ysabel Armijo, on the sixth day of September, 1858. The note was for one thousand dollars, bearing interest at one per cent per month until May 6, 1859, and at the rate of two per cent per month thereafter until due, September 6, 1859.
The complaint alleges that on the day the note was executed it was transferred to the plaintiff by indorsement, in consideration of eight hundred dollars paid by him to the payee, Ysabel Armijo.
The complaint was filed October 6, 1860; summons was issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- TUCKER v. MorelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Kline v. BeebeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
- Whitney v. DutchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Jackson ex dem. Wallace v. CarpenterNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Goodsell v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1830
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Williams v. SapiehaTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Hurley v. Southern California Edison Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Dixon v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Goodnow v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.