Legal Opinion

Darsie v. Avia Group International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1994No. 94-1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, Craig Darsie and Sports Distribution Professionals (SDP), appeal the district court’s1 order dismissing without prejudice their cause of action involving three contract disputes with the defendant corporations, Reebok International, Ltd. (Reebok) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Avia Group International, Inc. (Avia). The plaintiffs contend that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing their complaint pursuant to the “exceptional circumstances” test articulated in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Janet M. Fiedler, a Minor by Raymond L. Fiedler, Her Guardian Ad Litem, and Raymond L. Fiedler, Individually v. Reliance Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Conner v. Delon Oldsmobile Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Craig Darsie v. Avia Group International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API