Legal Opinion

Goetz v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 29, 1958No. Civ. A. 1009-56PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

Jurisdiction of this action is conferred by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1). Plaintiffs (taxpayers), husband and wife, seek refund of portion of income tax ($1,381.-74), alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected for the calendar year 1952 by reason of disallowance of claimed loss deduction of $2,500 from gross income (representing one-half of $5,000 paid on a contract hereinafter discussed) under 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(e) (1). The case has been submitted upon the pleadings, the transcript of the pretrial order, a written stipulation of facts and the documentary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Burnet v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruschmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
  2. Ruschmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API