Legal Opinion

Ruschmann v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 29, 1958No. Civ. A. 1010-56PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

In this case plaintiff Henry Rusch-mann was an equal partner with Henry Goetz in the firm of Goetz and Rusch-mann (G & R) and claimed as a deduction from gross income for the taxable year 1952 one-half of the $5,000. paid by that firm to Franz Mueller und Sohn (Mueller), of Bielefeld, Germany. The facts in this case, therefore, are in all respects similar with those in Goetz v. United States, D.C., 162 F.Supp. 657, except for the offset claimed by the Government against Ruschmann, in the amount of $1,350.

For the reasons stated, therefore, in my opinion in Goetz v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goetz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruschmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API