Legal Opinion
Burke v. Kenny
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 12, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Francis X. Burke, in these proceedings, seeks a judgment "that plaintiff is the lawfully appointed and functioning City Clerk of the City of Jersey City and that the appointment of the defendant, James A. Tumulty, is illegal and void, and further seeks a judgment of this court that plaintiff is entitled to receive the salary and emoluments of the office from the 17th day of May, 1949, and to be restored to the possession and custody of the office of City Clerk…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maxwell v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Manahan v. WattsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Van Brookhoven v. KennedySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Fox v. Board of Education of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Fox v. Board of Education of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Talty v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, SCH. DIST. OF CITY OF HOBOKENSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Burke v. KennyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- TP. OF HOPEWELL v. GruchowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Fried v. Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979