Legal Opinion

Fisk-Allied v. Manhattan Construction Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 11, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 93-CV-175Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

On April 16th, plaintiff Fisk-Allied (FA), subcontractor, filed a diversity suit against *335Manhattan Construction Company, Inc. (MCC), contractor, in contract, tort, and quantum meruit, for $3.1 million in damages (delay, disruption, and acceleration costs) incurred by MCC’s revised work schedule. FA now seeks a preliminary injunction requiring MCC to establish a $3.1 million trust account with FA as beneficiary to prevent dissipation of the funds pending resolution of its suit against MCC and in accordance with the Texas Construction Trust Fund Statute.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Enterprise International, Inc. v. Corporacion Estatal Petrolera EcuatorianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. In the Matter of Christopher Wallace Boyle, Debtor. Christopher Wallace Boyle v. Abilene Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. In the Matter of Wilson J. NICHOLAS, Jr., Debtor. COBURN COMPANY OF BEAUMONT, Appellant, v. Wilson J. NICHOLAS, Jr., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. 183/620 Group Joint Venture v. SPF Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Minexa Arizona, Inc. v. Staubach, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API